<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Matcor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matcor.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pipeline Construction Expansion Expected &#8211; LNG by Kevin Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/pipeline-construction-expansion-expected-lng/#comment-24831</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matcor.com/blog/?p=1968#comment-24831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To whom it may concern, I&#039;ve currently followed the need in pipe line construction. Alyeska pipe line in Alaska asked how we would bullet proof the pipeline. I told them, they haven&#039;t found a way to do what we can in this area in a cost effective way. Not only can we provide bullet resistant up to a 50 caliber bullet, at the same install we can provide blast resistant material. If this is of any concern please feel free to contact me. vindeanballistics.com / kevin@vindean.com / 1-907-244-3882]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To whom it may concern, I&#8217;ve currently followed the need in pipe line construction. Alyeska pipe line in Alaska asked how we would bullet proof the pipeline. I told them, they haven&#8217;t found a way to do what we can in this area in a cost effective way. Not only can we provide bullet resistant up to a 50 caliber bullet, at the same install we can provide blast resistant material. If this is of any concern please feel free to contact me. vindeanballistics.com / <a href="mailto:kevin@vindean.com">kevin@vindean.com</a> / 1-907-244-3882</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pipeline Project Moving Forward&#8230; by Robby Propes</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/pipeline-project-moving-forward/#comment-24525</link>
		<dc:creator>Robby Propes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matcor.com/blog/?p=1897#comment-24525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marco is a quality inspection company that provides all your NDT needs . We do alot of work with Enbridge in Texas and would like a chance to bid on the inspection needs of this pipeline . Please let us know what we would need to do to be apart of this job . Thank You !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marco is a quality inspection company that provides all your NDT needs . We do alot of work with Enbridge in Texas and would like a chance to bid on the inspection needs of this pipeline . Please let us know what we would need to do to be apart of this job . Thank You !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Minister Bennett predicts a natural gas boom as way cleared for LNG plant by nick bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/community-minister-bennett-predicts-a-natural-gas-boom/#comment-24249</link>
		<dc:creator>nick bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matcor.com/blog/?p=1900#comment-24249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh my God, are they fracking???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my God, are they fracking???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pipeline with Coating Degradation benefit from Deep Well Anode Solution by Ted Huck</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/pipeline-with-coating-degradation-benefit-from-deep-well-anode-solution/#comment-24228</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Huck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=734#comment-24228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impressed Current Systems use an external power supply to drive current off the anode.  This allows the CP system designer to select an anode based on its properties as an anode (current capacity, consumption rate, etc...)  The analogy is using a pump in a piping system to provide motive force to move liquids through the system

Galvanic Anode systems utilize the natural potential difference between the anode material and the structure.  Since we are generally talking about CP protecting steel or iron, the only metals that can be used are magnesium, zinc and aluminum as these are more electrically negative than steel/iron.  The designer has minimal flexibility with these materials - the only driving force is the small difference in potential between the two metals to create a flow of current.  The analogy is a gravity fed piping system that relies solely on gravity to induce flow.  Great if it works but if it doesn&#039;t work it doesn&#039;t work.

From a design standpoint there are pros and cons of both types of systems, but remember that with galvanic systems, there is no power supply and no means of providing additional driving force to increase current output.  With impressed current systems there is a power supply and you can turn the voltage up or down to adjust current output.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressed Current Systems use an external power supply to drive current off the anode.  This allows the CP system designer to select an anode based on its properties as an anode (current capacity, consumption rate, etc&#8230;)  The analogy is using a pump in a piping system to provide motive force to move liquids through the system</p>
<p>Galvanic Anode systems utilize the natural potential difference between the anode material and the structure.  Since we are generally talking about CP protecting steel or iron, the only metals that can be used are magnesium, zinc and aluminum as these are more electrically negative than steel/iron.  The designer has minimal flexibility with these materials &#8211; the only driving force is the small difference in potential between the two metals to create a flow of current.  The analogy is a gravity fed piping system that relies solely on gravity to induce flow.  Great if it works but if it doesn&#8217;t work it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>From a design standpoint there are pros and cons of both types of systems, but remember that with galvanic systems, there is no power supply and no means of providing additional driving force to increase current output.  With impressed current systems there is a power supply and you can turn the voltage up or down to adjust current output.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pipeline with Coating Degradation benefit from Deep Well Anode Solution by Pipeline cathodic protection</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/pipeline-with-coating-degradation-benefit-from-deep-well-anode-solution/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>Pipeline cathodic protection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=734#comment-24220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two types of pipeline cathodic protection, galvanic and impressed current cathodic protection. What is the difference between them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two types of pipeline cathodic protection, galvanic and impressed current cathodic protection. What is the difference between them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cathodic Protection &#8211; An Essential Requirement for Power Plant Asset Management by Pipeline cathodic protection</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/cathodic-protection-an-essential-requirement-for-power-plant-asset-management/#comment-16914</link>
		<dc:creator>Pipeline cathodic protection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=257#comment-16914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can pipeline cathodic protection be retrofitted for aging subsea pipeline. And how is this accomplished?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can pipeline cathodic protection be retrofitted for aging subsea pipeline. And how is this accomplished?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corrosion Costs U.S. DOD $20.9 Billion Annually by corrosioneering</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/corrosion-costs-u-s-dod-20-9-billion-annually/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>corrosioneering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=1682#comment-123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://corrosioneeringplus.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/corrosion-costs-u-s-dod-20-9-billion-annually/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Corrosioneering +&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://corrosioneeringplus.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/corrosion-costs-u-s-dod-20-9-billion-annually/" rel="nofollow">Corrosioneering +</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Texas refinery unit shut down for &#8216;several months&#8217; as it investigates major corrosion problem by Chase Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/texas-refinery-unit-shut-down-for-several-months-as-it-investigates-major-corrosion-problem/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=1611#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The said thing is that officials were aware of this problem and tried to start the unit anyway.  Where is the concern for  public safety?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The said thing is that officials were aware of this problem and tried to start the unit anyway.  Where is the concern for  public safety?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lockheed&#8217;s Littoral Ship &#8216;Corroding Before Our Eyes&#8217; by corrosioneering</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/lockheeds-littoral-ship-corroding-before-our-eyes/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>corrosioneering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 00:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=1531#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://corrosioneeringphilippines.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/lockheeds-littoral-ship-corroding-before-our-eyes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Corrosion Engineering Source&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://corrosioneeringphilippines.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/lockheeds-littoral-ship-corroding-before-our-eyes/" rel="nofollow">Corrosion Engineering Source</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pipeline that leaked &#8211; safe to reopen by corrosioneering</title>
		<link>http://www.matcor.com/blog/pipeline-that-leaked-safe-to-reopen/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>corrosioneering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integritythatworks.wordpress.com/?p=1512#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://corrosioneeringphilippines.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/166/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Corrosion Engineering Source&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://corrosioneeringphilippines.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/166/" rel="nofollow">Corrosion Engineering Source</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
