Tag Archives: DOE

DOE to delay new cost, schedule for vit plant over corrosion concerns

The Department of Energy will delay coming up with a new cost and schedule for Hanford’s huge vitrification plant after a technical panel agreed with an employee that erosion and corrosion within the plant must be addressed.

David Huizenga, DOE’s senior adviser for environmental management, made the announcement today in a national media call after congressional leaders were briefed this morning.

Resolving technical issues, including how to keep radioactive waste well mixed and to prevent erosion and corrosion within the plant, is expected to take more than a year and cost tens of millions of dollars, Huizenga said.

The testing is intended to give additional confidence that the Waste Treatment Plant can operate for the full 40 years planned to treat up to 56 million gallons of radioactive waste for disposal, Huizenga said.

The waste, held in underground tanks, is left from the past production of plutonium for the nation’s nuclear weapons program.

“We’re trying to address technical issues head on and realistically,” Huizenga said.

By acknowledging issues now, the plant will not end up with unanticipated costs and maintenance issues in the future, he said.

Now the plant is legally required to start operating in 2019 and is projected to cost $12.2 billion, but DOE will not be able to finish it by then and at that price.

DOE had instructed its contractor Bechtel National in February to propose a new cost and schedule for the vitrification plant, which was due in August.

But with technical questions to be addressed for parts of the plant that will handle large quantities of high level radioactive waste, Bechtel will proceed only with a cost and schedule revision for the plant’s Low Level Waste Facility, the Analytical Laboratory and about 20 support facilities.

When testing is finished, it then can address additional cost and schedule information for the vit plant’s High Level Waste Facility and Pretreatment Facility.

Those two buildings have areas called “black cells,” that will be too radioactively hot for workers to safely enter after the plant begins operating for maintenance or to make repairs.

Construction at those facilities already has been ramped down and no further layoffs are anticipated.

Don Alexander, a DOE scientist, raised questions regarding erosion and corrosion in piping and tanks in black cells within the plant in September in a Difference of Professional Opinion report, disagreeing with scientific opinion accepted by DOE.

It was the third set of issues he’d raised in an ongoing Difference of Professional Opinion.

DOE addressed his concerns with a panel of technical experts that concluded his concerns are legitimate, and now DOE is planning testing that will be done in conjunction with already planned mixing testing to resolve them, Huizenga said.

“I think this demonstrates if people raise issues, we are willing to make tough decisions to address them,” Huizenga said.

Issues about corrosion at Hanford Vitrification plant

Hanford vitrification plant testing has not shown that components that will be difficult to replace can last the required 40 years the plant is designed to operate, according to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

Whether vessels and piping for high-level radioactive waste in the plant will corrode is an issue raised by DOE scientist Donald Alexander in an unresolved Differing Professional Opinion in May. The defense board also has been evaluating wear issues for the past nine months.

The defense board sent a letter to DOE on Friday asking for a briefing within 45 days to provide confidence that the vitrification plant will operate safely and reliably for 40 years.

It noted that DOE, with contractor Bechtel National, is developing a course of action to address wear design issues.

“However, the current pace of the contractor’s efforts to close the issues does not support timely resolution,” said a defense board staff report that accompanied the letter.

Some of the vessels in question are scheduled to be installed at the vitrification plant in August and modification will become progressively more difficult and costly after the vessels are closed and installed, the report said.

The $12.2 billion vitrification plant is being built to turn radioactive waste left from past weapons production of plutonium at Hanford into a stable glass form for disposal.

Much of the piping and many of the vessels in the plant will be in areas called black cells that will be too highly radioactive for workers to enter once waste processing begins. Consequently, their design is required to be maintenance-free for 40 years.

“Component failure due to wear … could stop waste processing for indefinite periods, resulting in significant extensions in the time required to accomplish the facility mission,” the defense board letter said. “The existing design margins offer little or no flexibility for future operations or the opportunity to extend the life of the plant, if required.”

Experimental testing to validate the wear model was limited and the results were flawed, said the defense board letter.

The design wear rates were derived mainly from information found in literature, including from experimental studies performed using slurries and conditions not representative of vitrification plant processes, the letter said. Assumptions to apply information to the vitrification plant were not adequately validated, the letter said.

Project officials have said that the wear models are conservative but have not substantiated that with an analysis, the letter said. The defense board said it found wear allowances provided in the design of some vessels and the pulse jet mixers are not conservative.

The pulse jet mixers are designed to operate like turkey basters, sucking up a slurry of waste and shooting it back out, to keep waste mixed in vessels without relying on moving parts that would require maintenance.

Experimental testing that was done on mixing vessel erosion collected data that lacked a discernible trend and displayed physically unrealistic results, the letter said.

“The Department of Energy remains fully committed to safety at this important facility, including the safety of our workers and the public,” said DOE spokeswoman Lindsey Geisler.

Information from the defense board will be used as DOE further develops and implements action to address erosion and corrosion of piping, vessels and pulse jet mixers, she said.

SOURCE: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2012/01/24/2363660/board-raises-issue-about-corrosion.html

Ancient Roman glass may yield clues to containing nuclear waste

A shipwreck 1,800 years ago in the Adriatic Sea might give scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory better information about how well modern glass might work to contain radioactive waste.

The Department of Energy is building a $12.2 billion vitrification plant at the Hanford nuclear reservation to glassify radioactive waste before it is buried deep in the ground.

The glass, formed from the waste and glass-forming materials, is planned to keep the radioactive waste secure for thousands of years. But until recently, the longest test on a piece of man-made glass holding simulated radioactive waste has been about 25 years.

Thanks to the shipwreck “we can use data points Romans thoughtfully started for us hundreds of years ago,” said Joseph Ryan, a senior scientist at the Department of Energy national laboratory in Richland.

He and scientist Denis Strachan, a laboratory fellow, are taking an atom-by-atom look at ancient glass to see how the glass has held up to corrosion.

Thursday, the two held up a chunk of green glass, marbled with iridescent streaks, that once was the handle of a jar.

It was among the glass that archaeologists believe was carried on the merchant ship Iulia Felix 1,800 years ago. The ship, which measured about 50 feet long, sank six miles off the coast of Grado, scattering glass at the bottom of the Adriatic Sea.

The Iulia Felix is believed to have carried containers of oils and spices, but also a barrel of glass pieces that may have been bound for the port of Aquileia, a center of Roman glass making. The glass pieces would have been recycled there.

Strachan and Ryan also have obtained glass from an archaeological dig at the ancient ruins of Aquileia. The glass is not as well dated, but also could be about 1,800 years old.

The most likely way for modern glass incorporating radioactive waste to corrode and dissolve after it is buried, contaminating the environment, is by exposure to water.

In the Iulia Felix sample, the scientists have pieces of glass that have been sitting in water for 1,800 years. The glass also has some chemical similarities to the glass that will be produced using Hanford’s radioactive waste. Both should contain about 20 percent to 25 percent sodium.

Strachan traveled to Italy to get the glass from the Aquileia archaeological excavation. He didn’t want just another piece of ancient glass, but glass still buried in the soil so researchers could look at how the glass dissolved and material from the glass moved into and through the soil.

The PNNL researchers have used a focused ion beam to machine minute cones out of the iridescent streaks in the glass from the Iulia Felix to look at samples measuring about 20 nanometers, or a ten-thousandth the diameter of a human hair. The iridescent streaks are caused by the reflection of light off the areas where the glass has corroded at the points the handle was attached to the jar.

The samples are being studied with an atom probe at the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory on the PNNL campus, which can show an atom-by-atom picture of the structure of the iridescent glass. Images show individual atoms arranged in layers of magnesium and oxygen.

The ancient glass wasn’t designed to be durable over 1,800 years, but it has held up well, Strachan said. And the glass planned to incorporate nuclear waste can be designed to be even more durable, he said.

But the study will put data to that assertion. It will provide a mathematical look at how glass dissolves that can be used to confirm and refine computer models now used to predict the performance of glass.

“We want to show if we put (waste) glass underground and let it sit for millions of years, the public will be safe,” Strachan said.

The study, which is part of international research on glass corrosion, is being paid for by the Department of Energy.

In addition to information about glassified waste from national defense projects, such as plutonium production at Hanford, DOE also is interested in information that could be useful if the nation decides to reprocess commercial nuclear fuel and then glassify the waste from reprocessing.

The project also could help archaeologists. By learning more about the rate of glass corrosion, archaeologists may be better able to date ancient glass.

SOURCE: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/08/12/1779898/ancient-roman-glass-may-yield.html#ixzz1UoYBBnji